- Home
- /Guides
- /operations
- /AI Deployment Lifecycle: From Development to Production
AI Deployment Lifecycle: From Development to Production
Learn the stages of deploying AI systems safely. From staging to production—practical guidance for each phase of the AI deployment lifecycle.
By Marcin Piekarski • Founder & Web Developer • builtweb.com.au
AI-Assisted by: Prism AI (Prism AI represents the collaborative AI assistance in content creation.)
Last Updated: 7 December 2025
TL;DR
AI deployment requires more than pushing code. Plan for model validation, staged rollouts, monitoring setup, and rollback capability. Each stage has checkpoints that must pass before proceeding. Build deployment as a process, not an event.
Why it matters
AI systems fail in production in ways that are hard to predict from development environments. Careful deployment practices catch issues before they affect users at scale. The cost of fixing production issues is orders of magnitude higher than catching them during deployment.
Deployment lifecycle stages
Stage 1: Pre-deployment
Before any deployment begins:
Model validation:
Documentation:
- Model card complete
- Deployment runbook ready
- Monitoring plan defined
- Rollback plan documented
Infrastructure:
- Resources provisioned
- Scaling configured
- Monitoring instrumented
- Logging enabled
Approvals:
- Technical review complete
- Ethics/bias review (if required)
- Security review (if required)
- Stakeholder sign-off
Stage 2: Staging environment
Deploy to staging first:
Environment requirements:
- Production-like configuration
- Representative data (sanitized)
- Full monitoring stack
- Realistic load patterns
Testing in staging:
- Functional tests pass
- Performance under load
- Integration with dependencies
- Error handling works
- Monitoring captures issues
Exit criteria:
- No blocking issues
- Performance acceptable
- All tests pass
- Monitoring working
Stage 3: Shadow deployment
Run alongside production without serving users:
Shadow mode operation:
- Receive real production traffic
- Process requests normally
- Compare outputs to current production
- Don't serve responses to users
What to evaluate:
- Output quality comparison
- Performance comparison
- Resource usage
- Error patterns
- Edge case handling
When to use shadow deployment:
- Significant model changes
- New architectures
- Risk-sensitive applications
- When you need production data validation
Stage 4: Canary deployment
Serve small percentage of real traffic:
Canary strategy:
Hour 0: 1% traffic
Hour 4: 5% traffic (if stable)
Hour 12: 25% traffic (if stable)
Hour 24: 50% traffic (if stable)
Hour 48: 100% traffic (if stable)
Monitoring during canary:
- Compare error rates (canary vs. stable)
- Compare latency distributions
- Compare output quality metrics
- Watch user feedback/complaints
Rollback triggers:
- Error rate > 2x baseline
- Latency > 1.5x baseline
- Quality metrics degraded
- User complaints spike
Stage 5: Full deployment
Complete the rollout:
Full deployment activities:
- Gradually shift remaining traffic
- Monitor continuously
- Keep rollback ready
- Communicate completion
Post-deployment:
- Verify all metrics stable
- Close deployment ticket
- Update documentation
- Archive artifacts
Deployment checklist
Pre-deployment checklist
- Model validation complete and passing
- Bias testing complete and acceptable
- Safety testing complete and passing
- Performance benchmarks met
- Documentation complete
- Rollback plan documented and tested
- Monitoring dashboards ready
- Alerting configured
- Required approvals obtained
Deployment day checklist
- Team available for deployment window
- Communication channels open
- Rollback procedure verified
- Monitoring dashboards open
- Previous deployment artifacts available
- Stakeholders notified
Post-deployment checklist
- All metrics within acceptable ranges
- No elevated error rates
- No user complaints
- Monitoring working correctly
- Documentation updated
- Deployment retrospective scheduled
Rollback strategy
When to rollback
Automatic rollback triggers:
- Error rate exceeds threshold
- Latency exceeds threshold
- Health checks fail
- Resource exhaustion
Manual rollback triggers:
- Quality degradation detected
- User complaints
- Harmful outputs discovered
- Security concerns
Rollback execution
Quick rollback (minutes):
- Traffic routing change
- Keep new version available
- Monitor old version stability
Full rollback (longer):
- Redeploy previous version
- Verify previous version stable
- Investigate new version issues
Rollback testing
Test regularly:
- Include rollback in deployment rehearsals
- Verify rollback works in staging
- Time your rollback procedure
- Document any issues
Deployment patterns
Blue-green deployment
Two identical environments:
- Blue: Current production
- Green: New version
Switch traffic between them for instant cutover and rollback.
Best for: When you need instant rollback capability
Rolling deployment
Gradually replace instances:
- Update instances one at a time
- Monitor each update
- Continue if stable
Best for: Large deployments where gradual transition is preferred
Feature flags
Control features independently of deployment:
- Deploy code with feature disabled
- Enable gradually via flag
- Disable quickly if problems
Best for: Separating deployment from release
Common mistakes
| Mistake | Consequence | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Skip staging | Issues discovered in production | Always use staging |
| Big bang deployment | Hard to isolate problems | Gradual rollout |
| No rollback plan | Stuck with broken system | Plan and test rollback |
| Insufficient monitoring | Issues go undetected | Comprehensive observability |
| Deploy on Friday | Weekend incidents | Deploy early in week |
What's next
Build robust operations:
- AI Incident Response — Handle deployment issues
- Monitoring AI Systems — Track system health
- AI Cost Management — Control deployment costs
Frequently Asked Questions
How long should canary deployments run?
Long enough to see representative traffic patterns—usually 24-48 hours minimum. If your traffic varies by day of week, consider running through a full week. Higher risk changes warrant longer canary periods.
What percentage of traffic should canary start with?
Start small: 1-5% for high-risk changes, up to 10% for lower-risk. The goal is catching problems before they affect many users while getting statistically significant data.
Should every deployment go through all stages?
Risk-based approach. High-risk changes (new models, major updates) should go through all stages. Low-risk changes (configuration updates, minor fixes) can use abbreviated processes. Define what qualifies for each path.
How do we handle urgent hotfixes?
Have an expedited path for critical fixes, but don't skip essentials: basic testing, monitoring, and rollback capability. Document the abbreviated process and use it sparingly.
Was this guide helpful?
Your feedback helps us improve our guides
About the Authors
Marcin Piekarski• Founder & Web Developer
Marcin is a web developer with 15+ years of experience, specializing in React, Vue, and Node.js. Based in Western Sydney, Australia, he's worked on projects for major brands including Gumtree, CommBank, Woolworths, and Optus. He uses AI tools, workflows, and agents daily in both his professional and personal life, and created Field Guide to AI to help others harness these productivity multipliers effectively.
Credentials & Experience:
- 15+ years web development experience
- Worked with major brands: Gumtree, CommBank, Woolworths, Optus, Nestlé, M&C Saatchi
- Founder of builtweb.com.au
- Daily AI tools user: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, AI coding assistants
- Specializes in modern frameworks: React, Vue, Node.js
Areas of Expertise:
Prism AI• AI Research & Writing Assistant
Prism AI is the AI ghostwriter behind Field Guide to AI—a collaborative ensemble of frontier models (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and others) that assist with research, drafting, and content synthesis. Like light through a prism, human expertise is refracted through multiple AI perspectives to create clear, comprehensive guides. All AI-generated content is reviewed, fact-checked, and refined by Marcin before publication.
Capabilities:
- Powered by frontier AI models: Claude (Anthropic), GPT-4 (OpenAI), Gemini (Google)
- Specializes in research synthesis and content drafting
- All output reviewed and verified by human experts
- Trained on authoritative AI documentation and research papers
Specializations:
Transparency Note: All AI-assisted content is thoroughly reviewed, fact-checked, and refined by Marcin Piekarski before publication. AI helps with research and drafting, but human expertise ensures accuracy and quality.
Key Terms Used in This Guide
Related Guides
AI Incident Response: Handling AI System Failures
IntermediateLearn to respond effectively when AI systems fail. From detection to resolution—practical procedures for managing AI incidents and minimizing harm.
Monitoring AI Systems in Production
IntermediateProduction AI requires continuous monitoring. Track performance, detect drift, alert on failures, and maintain quality over time.
AI Cost Management: Controlling AI Spending
IntermediateLearn to manage and optimize AI costs. From usage tracking to cost optimization strategies—practical guidance for keeping AI spending under control.